Film formation from polystyrene–poly(butyl acrylate‐co‐methyl methacrylate) latex blends

We have employed steady sate fluorescence (SSF) and UV‐visible (UVV) techniques to determine the film formation behavior of latex blends. Blend films were prepared from mixtures of a high‐T_g pyrene (P) labeled polystyrene (PS) latex and a low‐T_g copolymer of poly(butyl acrylate‐co‐methyl methacrylate) (BuA/MMA4). Eleven different blend films were prepared in various hard/soft latex compositions at room temperature and annealed at elevated temperatures above glass‐transition (T_g) temperature of polystyerene for 10 min. Fluorescence intensity (I_P) from P was measured after each annealing step to monitor the stages of film formation. The evolution of transparency of latex films was monitored using photon transmission intensity, I_tr. Film morphologies were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). A significant change occurs in both I_P and I_tr intensities at a certain critical weight fraction of hard latex (R_c = 0.3). Above R_c, two distinct film formation stages, which are named as void closure and interdiffusion processes, were seen in fluorescence data. Transparency of the films was decreased with decreasing PS content, indicating that a phase separation process occurs between PS and BuA/MMA4 phases by thermal treatment, which results in turbid films. However, below R_c, no change was observed in I_P and I_tr upon annealing, whereas transparency increased overall with increasing BuA/MMA4 ratio. We explained this result as the phase separation process between PS and BuA/MMA4 blends. These results were also confirmed by AFM pictures. Film formation stages above R_c were modeled and related activation energies were calculated. POLYM. COMPOS., 27:431–442, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers