Flexural Behavior of Continuous FRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams |
| |
Authors: | Mostafa El-Mogy Amr El-Ragaby Ehab El-Salakawy |
| |
Affiliation: | 1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6. 2Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6. 3Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair in Advanced Composite Materials and Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). E-mail: elsalaka@cc.umanitoba.ca
|
| |
Abstract: | Continuous concrete beams are commonly used elements in structures such as parking garages and overpasses, which might be exposed to extreme weather conditions and the application of deicing salts. The use of the fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) bars having no expansive corrosion product in these types of structures has become a viable alternative to steel bars to overcome the steel-corrosion problems. However, the ability of FRP materials to redistribute loads and moments in continuous beams is questionable due to the linear-elastic behavior of such materials up to failure. This paper presents the experimental results of four reinforced concrete beams with rectangular cross section of 200×300?mm continuous over two spans of 2,800 mm each. The material and the amount of longitudinal reinforcement were the main investigated parameters in this study. Two beams were reinforced with glass FRP (GFRP) bars in to different configurations while one beam was reinforced with carbon FRP bars. A steel-reinforced continuous concrete beam was also tested to compare the results. The experimental results showed that moment redistribution in FRP-reinforced continuous concrete beams is possible if the reinforcement configuration is chosen properly. Increasing the GFRP reinforcement at the midspan section compared to middle support section had positive effects on reducing midspan deflections and improving load capacity. The test results were compared to the available design models and FRP codes. It was concluded that the Canadian Standards Association Code (CSA/S806-02) could reasonably predict the failure load of the tested beams; however, it fails to predict the failure location. |
| |
Keywords: | Continuous beams Flexural strength Moment distribution Concrete beams Glass Carbon Fiber reinforced polymers |
|
|