Effects of Temperature and Humidity on the Characterization of C-4 Explosive Threats

Both the quantity and the amount of time that an explosive is present on the surface of a material is dependent upon the amount of explosive originally deposited on the surface, the adhesive forces, temperature and humidity, as well as other environmental factors. This laboratory study focused on evaluating RDX crystal morphology changes resulting from variations in temperature and humidity conditions of the sample. The temperature and humidity conditions were controlled using a Tenney THRJ environmental chamber and a Tenney T11RC-1.5 environmental chamber. These chambers allow the temperature and humidity to be held within ±3?°C and ±5?% RH. The temperature and humidity conditions used for this test series were: 4?°C/40?%RH, 21?°C/20?%RH (samples left on benchtop), 21?°C/70?%RH, 21?°C/95?%RH, 35?°C/40?%RH, 35?°C/70?%RH, and 35?°C/95?%RH. These temperature and humidity set points were chosen to represent a wide range of conditions that may be found in real world scenarios. C-4 (RDX crystals and binder material) was deposited on the surface of one of six substrates by placing a fingerprint from the explosive block onto the matrix surface. The substrates were chosen to provide a range of items that are commonly used. Six substrate types were used during these tests: 50?% cotton/50?% polyester as found in T-shirts, 100?% cotton with a smooth surface such as that found in a cotton dress shirt, 100?% cotton on a rough surface such as that found on canvas or denim, suede leather such as might be found on jackets, purses, or shoes, painted metal obtained from a car hood, and a computer diskette. The samples were not pre-cleaned prior to testing and contained sizing agents, and in the case of the metal: oil, dirt, scratches, and rust spots. The substrates were photographed at various stages of testing, using a Zeiss Discover V12 stereoscope with Axiocam ICc1 3 megapixel digital camera, to determine any changes in the crystalline morphology. Some of the samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy in an attempt to determine how the explosive was bound to the substrate. This is the second article in a series on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on trace explosive threats.