| Abstract: | This communication is a commentary on William W. Meissner's presentation (see record 2006-20697-003) of a patient who chronically came late for sessions. The time duration of analytic work-relatively restricted per hour yet potentially limitless in overall duration-represents an existential paradox that is fundamental to the basic representational qualities of mental experience, and inherent in a mute way in the analytic frame. It is to be expected that the latent temporal elements of the patient's conflicts will inevitably challenge this aspect of the frame, subtly coercing patient and analyst to recreate these novel dimensions. If the analyst is too cautious regarding the inevitability of countertransference reactions to such a patient, important developmental opportunities may be missed. I suspect that the chronic lateness and absence that characterized the work with this patient screened an early, nonmentalized trauma that had torn a hole in the foundations of the patient's sense of time, and was inadvertently expressed by Meissner in an entirely atypical manner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
