首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A new hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision methodology model for prioritizing the alternatives of the hydrogen bus development: A case study from Romania
Affiliation:1. Informetrics Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam;2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam;3. Romanian Association for Hydrogen Energy, Rm. Vâlcea, Romania;4. National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies ICSI, Rm. Vâlcea, Romania;5. Department of Industrial Engineering, Naval Academy, National Defense University, 34940 Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract:The aim of this study is to present an integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for the selection method of hydrogen bus development by considering five main and twenty sub-criteria. The model utilizes Best-Worst Method (BWM) and MARCOS (Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to COpromise Solution) approaches for prioritizing the alternatives of the appropriate hydrogen solution for public transport with buses. A case study in Romania verifies the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed model. A comparative analysis with some existing methods are presented to verify the superiority of the proposed model. This study analyzes two technical solutions for hydrogen production and refuelling infrastructure of fleet, and four electricity supply solutions for obtaining hydrogen by electrolysis. That means a total number of 8 alternatives. The results show that co-generated electricity from a municipality cogeneration power plant (Alternative 2) is the best alternative among eight alternatives.
Keywords:Hydrogen buses  Hydrogen mobility  Fuzzy sets  Best-worst method  MARCOS  Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号