首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Quantifying reliability uncertainty from catastrophic and margin defects: A proof of concept
Authors:Christine M Anderson-Cook  Stephen Crowder  Aparna V Huzurbazar  John Lorio  James Ringland  Alyson G Wilson
Affiliation:a Statistical Sciences Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, MS F600 Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
b Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
c Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
d Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Abstract:We aim to analyze the effects of component level reliability data, including both catastrophic failures and margin failures, on system level reliability. While much work has been done to analyze margins and uncertainties at the component level, a gap exists in relating this component level analysis to the system level. We apply methodologies for aggregating uncertainty from component level data to quantify overall system uncertainty. We explore three approaches towards this goal, the classical Method of Moments (MOM), Bayesian, and Bootstrap methods. These three approaches are used to quantify the uncertainty in reliability for a system of mixed series and parallel components for which both pass/fail and continuous margin data are available. This paper provides proof of concept that uncertainty quantification methods can be constructed and applied to system reliability problems. In addition, application of these methods demonstrates that the results from the three fundamentally different approaches can be quite comparable.
Keywords:Method of moments  Bayesian analysis  Bootstrap  System reliability  Catastrophic and margins failure modes
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号