首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

弹性模量仪器化压入测试方法比较分析
引用本文:陈伟,马德军,宋仲康,王家梁. 弹性模量仪器化压入测试方法比较分析[J]. 机械工程师, 2010, 0(10): 7-9
作者姓名:陈伟  马德军  宋仲康  王家梁
作者单位:装甲兵工程学院机械工程系,北京,100072
摘    要:文中以弹性模量仪器化压入测试方法的力学模型、传感器性能指标对测试结果的影响、数据处理方法对测试结果的影响为切入点,对三种仪器化压入测试方法进行分析比较.纯能量方法建立的力学模型准确地解释了仪器化压入过程,对测试传感器性能参数和数据处理方法的敏感程度较低,具有一定的鲁棒性.

关 键 词:仪器化压入  灵敏度  线性度  数据处理方法

Comparative Study of Instrumented Indentation Methods for Elastic Modulus
CHEN Wei,MA De-jun,SONG Zhong-kong,WANG Jia-liang. Comparative Study of Instrumented Indentation Methods for Elastic Modulus[J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2010, 0(10): 7-9
Authors:CHEN Wei  MA De-jun  SONG Zhong-kong  WANG Jia-liang
Affiliation:CHEN Wei, MA De-jun, SONG Zhong-kong, WANG Jia- liang (Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Beijing 100072, China)
Abstract:This paper analyses and compares three methods of instrumented indentation in three aspects which are mechanical model, sensitivity to the test sensors and the affect of the data process methods. Pure energy method accords with the real mechanical behavior of instrumented indentation and the degree of sensitivity to the test sensors and data process methods is low. This method has certain robustness and is obviously preponderant.
Keywords:instrumented indentation  sensitivity  linearity  data process method
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号