首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

ATM交换机中缓冲区分配策略的比较--CBR业务情况
引用本文:余浩,詹志强,丁炜,朱祥华.ATM交换机中缓冲区分配策略的比较--CBR业务情况[J].北京邮电大学学报,1999,22(1):75-79.
作者姓名:余浩  詹志强  丁炜  朱祥华
作者单位:北京邮电大学培训中心,北京100876
基金项目:国家科技攻关项目;863-317-9601-02;
摘    要:采用计算机仿真的方法,在共享缓冲区型ATM交换机的输入端口为CBR精力流的情况下,从信元丢失率,平均时延,时延抖动3个方面对CP,CS,SMA,SMXQ4种缓冲区配策略的性能进行了比较研究,结果表明:无论是均匀业务环境还是非均匀业务环境,CP的缓冲区利用率最低,CS的缓冲区分配的公平性最差,而SMA及SMXQ在缓冲区利用率和分配的公平性上采取了一定的折衷而成为性能较好的策略。

关 键 词:异步转移模式  缓冲区分配策略  均匀业务  非均匀业务
修稿时间:1998-04-28

Comparison of Buffer Allocation Strategies in Shared Buffer ATM Switches--under CBR Traffic
Yu Hao,Zhan Zhiqiang,Ding Wei,Zhu Xianghua.Comparison of Buffer Allocation Strategies in Shared Buffer ATM Switches--under CBR Traffic[J].Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,1999,22(1):75-79.
Authors:Yu Hao  Zhan Zhiqiang  Ding Wei  Zhu Xianghua
Abstract:We use computer simulation to compares four types of buffer allocation strategies in shared buffer ATM switches under CBR load, including complete partition(CP), complete sharing(CS), sharing with minimum allocation(SMA), sharing with maximum queue length(SMXQ). We compare the four strategies from three aspects: cell loss probability(R), mean delay(D) and delay distribution (delay jitter). By the comparison, we find that CP is not good for its large buffer capacity, and CS is not good for its unfairness among the output ports. Because SMA and SMXQ have a trade off between buffer utilization and fairness , they are good buffer allocation strategies in practical applications.
Keywords:ATM  buffer allocation strategy  uniform  non  uniform
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号