首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types
Authors:M Pissavini  C Tricaud  G Wiener  A Lauer  M Contier  L Kolbe  C Trullás Cabanas  F Boyer  E Meredith  J de Lapuente  E Dietrich  PJ Matts
Affiliation:1. Coty-Lancaster SAM, 2, rue de la Lujerneta, Monaco, 98000 Monaco;2. L’Oréal, 188 rue Paul Hochart, Chevilly Larue, 94550 France;3. Edgewell Personal Care, Ormond Beach, FL, 32174 USA;4. Chanel PB, 135 avenue Charles de Gaulle, Neuilly sur Seine, 92200 France;5. LVMH Recherche Parfums et Cosmétiques, 185 avenue de Verdun, Saint Jean de Braye, 45800 France;6. Beiersdorf AG, Unnastrasse 48, Hamburg, 20245 Germany;7. ISDIN, Provençals 33, Barcelona, Spain;8. Pierre Fabre Dermo Cosmetique, Hôtel Dieu, 2 Rue Viguerie BP3071, Toulouse cedex, 3 31 025 France;9. CTPA, Sackville House, 40 Piccadilly, London, W1J 0DR UK;10. AC MARCA, Avenida Carrilet 293-297, L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907 Spain;11. Cosmetics Europe - The Personal Care Association, Avenue Herrmann-Debroux 40, Brussels, B-1160 Belgium;12. Procter & Gamble, Greater London Innovation Centre, Rusham Park, Whitehall Ln, Egham, TW20 9NW UK
Abstract:In 2017, Cosmetics Europe performed a double-blinded ring test of 24 emulsion-type sunscreen products, across 3 in vivo test laboratories and 3 in vitro test laboratories, using a new candidate in vitro SPF test method. Based on the results of this work, an article was published showing how data derived from a new lead candidate method conform to new International Standards (ISO) acceptance criteria for alternative SPF test methods (Any alternative method should consider the matrix effect and if required, specify the matrix applicability of the method; Criterion 1a: Systematic differences between methods should be negligible: 95% of all individual results of an alternative method are within the range of ±2× reproducibility standard deviation of the in vivo method, that is overall bias must be below 0.5× reproducibility standard deviation of the in vivo method; Criterion 1b: Measurement uncertainty of an alternative method should be below the measurement uncertainty of the in vivo method. Candidate method predicted values must fall within the full ‘funnel’ (SPF 6-50+) limits proposed by Cosmetics Europe (derived from the same minimum test design, that is using the ISO24444 Method to measure at least 24 products across at least 3 laboratories using at least 5 test subjects/laboratory, in a blinded fashion).). Of the 24 sunscreen products tested, the majority of emulsions were of the oil-in-water (O/W) type, whereas only one was water-in-oil (W/O) and there were no products with a mineral-only sun filter system. In order to confirm the scope of this method, therefore, a new study was conducted that included 73 W/O (12 mineral + organic, 44 mineral only and 17 organic only) and 3 O/W mineral-only, emulsion-type sunscreen products (a total of 76 new sunscreen products). When combined with the previous 24 products (tested in 3 different laboratories), this yielded a new data set comprising a total of 100 emulsion-type sunscreen products, with SPF values ranging from 6 to 50+ (with a total of 148 data points). These products were tested using the double-plate in vitro SPF test method and compared with the ISO TC217/WG7 acceptance criteria for alternative SPF test methods. Over 95% of paired in vitro: in vivo SPF values lay within the upper and lower limits of the ISO acceptance criteria funnel, with no bias. This new in vitro SPF test method, therefore, meets the minimum requirements for an alternative SPF test method to ISO24444:2010, for emulsion-type sunscreen products (which make up the majority of marketed sunscreen products).
Keywords:Sun Protection Factor  in vitro  ISO  ring test
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号