Probabilistic approach in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue: volume and surface effects

The stress gradient and the size of a component are known to influence the fatigue strength of metallic components. Indeed, in high‐cycle fatigue, experiments prove that the stress distribution as well as the size of the loaded specimen can be responsible for changes in the fatigue limit (for instance, the fatigue limits in tension and bending are different, and decrease with the size of the specimen). When dealing with multiaxial load conditions, those effects still act but a relevant criterion must be used to account for the complex state of stress. The weakest‐link concept together with a multiaxial endurance criterion based on a microplasticity analysis are then combined to describe the fatigue limit distribution of different metallic materials. Several load conditions are analysed: tension–compression, torsion, rotating bending and plane bending. By means of the proposed model, all the known effects on fatigue strength can be reflected. First, the endurance probability can be adequately predicted for any complex load conditions knowing some reference data from uniaxial fatigue tests. It can be linked to the probability of finding a defect with a critical size. The weakest‐link theory also accounts for the decrease of multiaxial fatigue limit with the stressed volume. For the same load condition (i.e. for the same stress distribution in the volume), the probability of finding a critical defect increases with the component size and then according to the weakest‐link theory the fatigue strength drops. A second model, based only on the damage developed at the surface, is also proposed. While the original Weibull theory makes no distinction between potential initiation sites at the free surface and in the volume and can lead to unsatisfactory predictions when applied to materials containing defects such as nodular cast iron, the new surface approach distinguishes between surface and volume effects.