首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

塔里木盆地古生界海相油气来源争议与寒武系主力烃源岩的确定
引用本文:李峰,朱光有,吕修祥,张志遥,吴郑辉,薛楠,贺涛,汪瑞.塔里木盆地古生界海相油气来源争议与寒武系主力烃源岩的确定[J].石油学报,2021,42(11):1417-1436.
作者姓名:李峰  朱光有  吕修祥  张志遥  吴郑辉  薛楠  贺涛  汪瑞
作者单位:1. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室 北京 102249;2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 北京 100083
基金项目:国家科技重大专项"深层储层发育的埋藏构造-流体环境"(2017ZX05008-003-010)、"塔里木盆地奥陶系—前寒武系碳酸盐岩油气资源潜力及目标优选"(2016ZX05004-004)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目"古老碳酸盐岩油气成藏分布规模与关键技术"(2019B-04)和"深层烃源岩形成与分布"(2018A-0102)资助。
摘    要:塔里木盆地古生代海相地层油气资源丰富,是中国唯一一个发现大规模海相石油的盆地。虽然经历了近40年的勘探开发与科学研究,海相油气探明储量近30×108t,但盆地台盆区海相油气的来源问题(是来自于寒武系-下奥陶统烃源岩,还是来自于中-上奥陶统烃源岩)一直存在争议。一方面,生物标志化合物和碳、硫同位素等不同地球化学指标指示油气具多源性,在学术界产生较大争议;另一方面,地质勘探的实际规律表明,油气富集分布与油源断裂密切相关,绝大多数勘探家认为寒武系是台盆区海相油气的主力烃源岩。通过系统总结和对比塔里木盆地油气源研究的历史、争议的焦点与依据,结合近年来模拟实验数据和勘探认识,发现烃源岩的热演化差异性和各类次生作用是导致油源对比结果出现争议的关键原因,生物标志化合物、碳同位素等指标的有效性是在限定的范围内。基于芳基类异戊二烯、硫同位素、单体碳同位素等建立了油源对比的新指标,揭示了台盆区油气的主要来源是寒武系烃源岩。目前奥陶系发现的油气主要通过断穿寒武系的断裂体系运移而来。

关 键 词:油源对比  寒武系  奥陶系  硫同位素  烃源岩  塔里木盆地  
收稿时间:2020-03-24
修稿时间:2021-05-06

The disputes on the source of Paleozoic marine oil and gas and the determination of the Cambrian system as the main source rocks in Tarim Basin
Li Feng,Zhu Guangyou,Lü Xiuxiang,Zhang Zhiyao,Wu Zhenghui,Xue Nan,He Tao,Wang Rui.The disputes on the source of Paleozoic marine oil and gas and the determination of the Cambrian system as the main source rocks in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(11):1417-1436.
Authors:Li Feng  Zhu Guangyou  Lü Xiuxiang  Zhang Zhiyao  Wu Zhenghui  Xue Nan  He Tao  Wang Rui
Affiliation:1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:Tarim Basin has rich oil and gas resources in the Paleozoic marine strata, and is the only basin where large-scale marine crude oil has been discovered in China. After nearly 40 years of exploration and development and scientific researches, marine oilfields with nearly 3 billion tons of reserves have been discovered. However, there have been some disputes on the source of marine oil and gas in the platform area from the source rock in the Cambrian-Lower Ordovician or the Middle-Upper Ordovician. On the one hand, based on fact that different geochemical indicators of biomarker compounds, carbon, and sulfur isotopes indicate different sources of oil and gas, great controversy has been aroused in the academic community; on the other hand, the geological exploration laws demonstrate that the enrichment and distribution of oil and gas are closely related with oil source fault, and most prospectors believe that the main source rocks are in the Cambrian strata. Based on a systematical summarization and comparison on the history of oil and gas sources in the Tarim Basin, the focus and basis of disputes, in combination with the simulation data and exploration knowledge obtained in recent years, it is found that the differences in thermal evolution and various secondary process of source rocks are the key reasons for disputes on the oil source correlation, and that the validity of the indicators such as biomarkers and carbon isotopes is within a limited range. According to aryl isoprenoid, sulfur isotope, and individual n-alkane isotope, new indicators of oil source correlation have been established, which reveal that the main source of oil and gas in the platform area is Cambrian source rocks. The Ordovician oil and gas discovered nowadays mainly migrated through the fault system of the Cambrian source rock.
Keywords:oil source correlation  Cambrian  Ordovician  sulfur isotopes  source rock  Tarim Basin  
点击此处可从《石油学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《石油学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号