Utility of Suspended Solid Measurements for Storm-Water Runoff Treatment |
| |
Authors: | Masoud Kayhanian Ehsan Rasa Akshay Vichare Jon E Leatherbarrow |
| |
Affiliation: | 1Associate Director, Center for Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, One Shields Ave., Engineering III, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). E-mail: mdkayhanian@ucdavis.edu 2MS Student, Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, One Shields Ave., Engineering III, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: erasa@ucdavis.edu 3MS Student, Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, One Shields Ave., Engineering III, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: auvichare@ucdavis.edu 4Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, One Shields Ave., Engineering III, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: leatherbarrow@ucdavis.edu
|
| |
Abstract: | In this paper alternative solutions are presented to solve problems associated with the measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) in storm-water runoff. Results revealed that the accuracy of TSS measurement is largely related to sample representativeness, particle size distribution (PSD), sampling pipette position, and sample mixing. In general, when the PSD in the runoff was mostly larger than 75?μm, the most accurate and reproducible results were obtained when samples were collected from a position of mid-depth and midway between the walls of the beaker and the vortex and mixed at speeds in the range of 600–700?rpm. For runoff samples with a PSD smaller than 75?μm, mixing at a higher rpm is not a significant factor. As long as the PSD in the TSS subsample is representative of the original sample, a strong correlation between TSS and suspended solid concentration can be achieved. The results showed that density was largely correlated with the organic content of the particles, and, in general, smaller particles tended to have a lower density. The density results revealed that assuming a single sand size density of 2.6?g/cm3 for storm-water runoff produced a large error in the computation of sediment load and particle settling velocity. |
| |
Keywords: | Stormwater management Particle size distribution Suspended solids Suspended sediment Particles Best management practice Runoff |
|
|