| 浅析受贿罪讯问中的逻辑错误 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张爽.浅析受贿罪讯问中的逻辑错误[J].重庆工学院学报,2006,20(1):66-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张爽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东外语外贸大学法学院 广州510420 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 犯罪嫌疑人的供述是认定受贿罪的“证据之王”,而讯问中逻辑错误的常见、多发,却严重削弱了其证明力,给反贪工作造成不必要的损失。为此,侦查人员在讯问中必须杜绝预期理由、混淆论题、不正当的复杂问语、推不出、论题含混等逻辑错误。
|
| 关 键 词： | 讯问 预期理由 混淆论题 不正当的复杂问语 推不出 论题含混 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-0924（2006）01-0066-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-11-21 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年11月21 |
Simple Analysis on Common Logical Errors Existing in Interrogation of Bribery Cases |
| |
| ZHANG Shuang.Simple Analysis on Common Logical Errors Existing in Interrogation of Bribery Cases[J].Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology,2006,20(1):66-69. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Shuang |
| |
| Affiliation: | Law School, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The confession of bribery suspects is generally recognized as "king of evidence" for the conviction of bribery crimes,while common and frequently happening logic errors in interrogation of bribery suspects undermines its evidence effect,which causes unnecessary losses for anti-corruption campaign.Therefore,the errors in logic,such as anticipatory reasons,blurring propositions,complicated interrogative languages inability to infer,and ambiguous propositions should be avoided. |
| |
| Keywords: | interrogation anticipatory reason blurring proposition unjust complicated interrogative languages inability to be inferred ambiguous proposition |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
