首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Al2O3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较
引用本文:陈劲民,李永强,熊正烨,王文华,封余军,黄存友,汤照,师文庆.Al2O3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较[J].核技术,2012(2):109-112.
作者姓名:陈劲民  李永强  熊正烨  王文华  封余军  黄存友  汤照  师文庆
作者单位:广东海洋大学理学院
基金项目:湛江市科技攻关项目;广东海洋大学科研基金资助
摘    要:用Al2O3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P热释光剂量计(TLD)测量湛江市区本底辐射的热释光响应,以选取适合低辐射场辐射剂量测量的TLD。它们的最低响应剂量依次为Al2O3:C(1–2μGy)、LiF:Mg,Cu,P(约2μGy)和LiF:Mg,Ti(>10μGy)。Al2O3:C的热释光峰温较低,对较长时间段(>30 d)的累积剂量,存在较明显的热释光衰退,剂量响应曲线偏离线性;LiF:Mg,Cu,P和LiF:Mg,Ti的发光峰温较高,数年内都很稳定。综合考虑灵敏度和稳定性,LiF:Mg,Cu,P更宜于低辐射场的累积剂量测量。

关 键 词:热释光  本底辐射  Al2O3  LiF

Thermoluminescence comparison among Al2O3:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement
CHEN Jingmin,LI Yongqiang,XIONG Zhengye,WANG Wenhua,FENG Yujun,HUANG Cunyou,TANG Zhao,SHI Wenqing.Thermoluminescence comparison among Al2O3:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement[J].Nuclear Techniques,2012(2):109-112.
Authors:CHEN Jingmin  LI Yongqiang  XIONG Zhengye  WANG Wenhua  FENG Yujun  HUANG Cunyou  TANG Zhao  SHI Wenqing
Affiliation:(School of Science,Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang 524088,China)
Abstract:To select thermoluminescent dosimeters(TLDs) for low radiation research,thermoluminescence responses of Al2O3:C,LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P were measured under natural radiation background in Zhanjiang city,China.TL sensitivity of the three TLDs,in terms of the threshold dose,is sequenced as Al2O3:C(1~2 μGy),LiF:Mg,Cu,P(about 2 μGy),and LiF:Mg,Ti(>10 μGy).However,as the temperature of glow peak of Al2O3:C is not so high,its TL decays in a relatively long period,hence the non-linearity of the TL dose response curve of Al2O3:C,while temperatures of glow peaks of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P are higher,hence their linear TL dose response.Therefore,LiF:Mg,Cu,P is the best TLD for low radiation cumulative dose detection.
Keywords:Thermoluminescence(TL)  Natural background radiation  Al2O3  LiF
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号