首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

能见度自动观测仪与人工观测资料对比分析
引用本文:赵晓莉,闫军,苑跃,王凌.能见度自动观测仪与人工观测资料对比分析[J].计算技术与自动化,2013(4):138-141.
作者姓名:赵晓莉  闫军  苑跃  王凌
作者单位:[1]四川省气象信息中心,四川成都610072 [2]成都市气象局,四川成都610000
摘    要:利用四川5个能见度自动观测站2012年整年数据与人工平行观测数据进行对比分析。结果表明,当能见度小于3kin时,能见度自动观测与人工观测差异较小,在此能见度范围下人工观测结果小于自动观测结果,能见度自动观测结果可以代替人工观测结果。当能见度为3-10km时,由于观测员自身的视力、习惯以及对“能见”的最远目标物和“不能见”的最近目标物的不明确,导致能见度自动观测和人工观测结果差异偏大至-1.62km,自动观测结果开始小于人工观测结果。当能见度大于10km时,差异加剧。

关 键 词:能见度自动观测仪  人工观测  对比

Comparative Analysis Visibility Automatic and Artificial Observation Data
ZHAO Xiao-li,YAN Jun,YUAN Yao,WANG Ling.Comparative Analysis Visibility Automatic and Artificial Observation Data[J].Computing Technology and Automation,2013(4):138-141.
Authors:ZHAO Xiao-li  YAN Jun  YUAN Yao  WANG Ling
Affiliation:1 (1. Sichuan Provincial Meteorological Bureau, Chengdu 610072,China 2. ChengDu Meteorological Bureau, Chengdu 610000,China)
Abstract:Used the data of year 2012 from five visibility automatic stations Compared and analyzed. The results showed that when the visibility less than 3km,visihility automatic observation and artificial observation had little differences. In this range of visibility, artificial observation results were less than the automatic observation results, and visibility automatic ob- servation results can replace artificial observations. When visibility was 3-10km, due to the observer's vision, habits, and the farthest and the latest target is not clear, visibility automatic observation and artificial observation results were partial to -1.62km, and automatic observation results begun to less than artificial observations. When the visibility was more than 10km, the intensifying was differences.
Keywords:visibility automatic viewer  artificial observation  comparison
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算技术与自动化》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算技术与自动化》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号