Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs |
| |
Authors: | Gade P B Christensen L |
| |
Affiliation: | Danish Meat Research Institute, Maglegaardsvej 2, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark |
| |
Abstract: | Four stocking densities (0.35, 0.39, 0.42 and 0.50 m2 per 100 kg pig) were investigated under Danish early Autumn conditions (16–24 ° C) in a study of the effect of transport conditions on pig welfare and meat quality. Two transports were carried out for each stocking density, the two producers concerned delivering pigs to the upper and lower tiers, respectively, of a specialist pig transport vehicle. Total average journey time was 2 hr 39 min and total average transport time 1 hr 47 min. After arrival at the factory pigs were lairaged in groups of 15 for about
hr and then slaughtered using minimal stress with group CO2-stunning. Pig behaviour was monitored during transport in the front compartment of the lower tier. Blood samples were taken at slaughter for analysis of creatine phosphokinase, lactate and cortisol and carcasses were evaluated for skin damage and meat quality. Stocking density, as such, had relatively little effect on blood profile or meat quality. Creatine phosphokinase levels were lowest with a stocking density of 0.50 m2 and the incidence of unacceptable skin damage was generally lowest with a stocking density of 0.35 m2 and highest with 0.42 m2. The main source of variation in this experiment was day of transport/slaughter within stocking density so that factors other than stocking density have affected the results obtained. Stocking density had a direct effect on pig behaviour during transport. Giving pigs more space during the short transport did not result in them lying down. On the contrary there was continuous disturbance from other pigs and at 0.42 and 0.50 m2 pigs had difficulty maintaining balance, when the vehicle negotiated bends or poor road surfaces. Variations in pig behaviour during transport could account for the observed differences in skin damage. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|