Increase in Perceived Odor Emissions with Loading of Ventilation Filters |
| |
Authors: | Pertti O. Pasanen,Jussi Teijonsalo,Olli Sepp nen,Juhani Ruuskanen,Pentti Kalliokoski |
| |
Affiliation: | Pertti O. Pasanen,Jussi Teijonsalo,Olli Seppänen,Juhani Ruuskanen,Pentti Kalliokoski |
| |
Abstract: | The development of odor emission rates from EU6 classified glass fiber bag filters was studied in four air-handling units (AHU), and emissions from the same kind of filters with EU3 classified polyester prefilters were studied in two units. The filters were loaded in six AHU in downtown Helsinki. The pressure drop was measured, and the odors of the filters were evaluated by a trained panel under laboratory conditions (T = 20°C, face velocity 1.0 m/s) every sixth week. The odor emissions of simultaneous atmospheric dust samples were also studied. The odor emissions of the filters rose during the first three months to a level where every third person would be dissatisfied. The emissions from coarse prefilters were similar to those from the more efficient filters without prefilters, and the emissions of the main filters were significantly lower if used with prefilters. This result indicates that the prefilters effectively protected the fine filters from odor-causing particles. The results of tests made with atmospheric samples agree with this result. Relative odor emissions were the highest in coarse fractions (> 10.0 μm). The pressure drop increased with the particle mass collected on the ventilation filter, but it did not correlate well with the odor emission of the filter. Thus, pressure drop alone is not an adequate criterion for changing supply air filters when hygienic aspects are a concern. |
| |
Keywords: | Odor Ventilation filter Prefilter Indoor air quality Outdoor air particles Filter change interval |
|
|