首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

高含硫气田开发安全防护距离探讨
引用本文:翁帮华,饶维,陈辉,郭世月,何敬阳.高含硫气田开发安全防护距离探讨[J].天然气工业,2016,36(10):143-148.
作者姓名:翁帮华  饶维  陈辉  郭世月  何敬阳
作者单位:1.中国石油西南油气田公司安全环保与技术监督研究院 2.国家能源高含硫气藏开采研发中心; 3.四川天宇石油环保安全技术咨询服务有限公司 4.中国石油中东公司哈法亚项目部; 5. 四川达美盛工程设计有限公司
摘    要:在高含硫气田作业场所设置安全防护距离,可以在发生井喷、含硫天然气泄漏事故时减少火灾、爆炸、H2S中毒等造成的人员伤亡,是控制和降低安全风险的有效手段之一。为此,分析了国内外相关安全标准对含硫气田安全防护距离的要求,并以四川盆地某高含硫气田为例,应用国内外相关标准或方法计算井场、集气管道及净化厂的安全防护距离,开展对比分析。结果表明,依据不同的方法确定的安全防护距离偏差较大,因此建议采用定量风险评价的方法作为确定搬迁距离的依据,采用EUB推荐的查图法及公式快速确定或依据计算的150 mg/m~3 H_2S包络线范围确定应急撤离距离。针对高含硫气田开发,建议采用以下措施降低风险:(1)设置紧急截断系统,减少含硫天然气潜在泄漏量;(2)提升装置本质安全,减少事故发生概率;(3)提高应急保障水平,减轻事故影响。


Safety protection distance in high-sulfur gas field development
Weng Banghua,Rao Wei,Chen Hui,Guo Shiyue,He Jingyang.Safety protection distance in high-sulfur gas field development[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(10):143-148.
Authors:Weng Banghua  Rao Wei  Chen Hui  Guo Shiyue  He Jingyang
Affiliation:(1.HSE and Technical Supervision Research Institute of PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. National Energy R&D Center of High Sulfur Gas Exploitation, 3.Sichuan Tianyu Petroleum Environmental Protection & Safety technology Consulting Services Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China; 4. PetroChina International; Iraq FZE Iraq Branch, Beijing 100120, China; 5. Sichuan DMS Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China)
Abstract:The safety protection distance set around high-sulfur gas field facilities is one of the effective means to control and reduce risks such as fire, explosion, H2S poisoning, etc., which may cause loss of life and personal injury. In view of this, Comparative analysis was conducted of the safety protection distances in high-sulfur gas fields regulated in the relevant safety standards and codes between China and other countries. In a case study of a high-sulfur gas field in the Sichuan Basin, the safety protection distances in the well sites, gas gathering lines and stations, and purification plants, etc. were calculated and compared by different codes and methods at home and abroad. Due to the great differences from the results, quantitative risk evaluation should be taken as the proof for determining the moving distance. Then the method and formula provided by Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (AEUB) was used to obtain the emergency evacuation distance away from the enveloped scope where the air contains 150 mg/m3 H2S. In the end, the following proposals for sour gas field development were put forward: establishing emergency shutdown systems to reduce potential sour gas leakage rate; improving the intrinsic safety of facilities to reduce the accident probability; and promoting the emergency support capability to mitigate the impacts caused by accidents.
Keywords:High-sulfur Gas Field  H2S emission and dispersion  Toxic zone  Safety separating distance  Quantitative risk  Individual risk contour line  Exclusion zone  Emergency response plan zone  Risk prevention and control    
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《天然气工业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《天然气工业》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号