首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

河涌底泥测量与清淤量计算方法比较
引用本文:王江辉,邓忠良,宁寻安,杨佐毅,李磊. 河涌底泥测量与清淤量计算方法比较[J]. 工程勘察, 2012, 0(2): 88-91
作者姓名:王江辉  邓忠良  宁寻安  杨佐毅  李磊
作者单位:[1]广东工业大学环境科学与工程学院,广州510006 [2]广东达安工程项目管理有限公司,广州510623
摘    要:采用声学多普勒水流剖面仪(ADCP)对麻涌河清淤前后水下地形进行测量,并结合实时动态GPS测量技术,通过相关软件获取清淤前后河底高程,然后分别应用AutoCAD、Excel常规软件法和南方CASS6.1测绘软件法对麻涌河清淤量进行模拟计算。通过对两种计算方法的结果分析比较,表明南方CASS6.1法从计算耗时和准确度而言更具优势。

关 键 词:底泥  清淤  水下测量  污染河流

Comparison on methods for calculating of the dredging volume with underwater surveying data in a polluted river
Wang Jianghui,Deng Zhongliang,Ning Xunan,Yang Zuoyi,Li Lei. Comparison on methods for calculating of the dredging volume with underwater surveying data in a polluted river[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2012, 0(2): 88-91
Authors:Wang Jianghui  Deng Zhongliang  Ning Xunan  Yang Zuoyi  Li Lei
Affiliation:1 Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; 2. DAAN Project Mangement Co. Ltd, Guangzhou 510623, China)
Abstract:Acoustic doppler current profilers was used for surveying underwater topography of Machong river before and after dredging, combined with realtime kinematic GPS technology, acquiring river bed elevation via relevance software. Then, AutoCAD, Excel, Google Earth and South CASS6. 1 were separately applied to simulate the calculation of dredging volume of Machong river. The results show that the CASS 6.1 is with higher efficiency and more accurate.
Keywords:sediment  dredging  bathymetric surveying  polluted river
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号