首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


"Leo Rangell and I: Where do we differ?" Response to Dr. Wallerstein: Part I.
Authors:Rangell   Leo
Abstract:Responds to a commentary by R. Wallerstein (see record 2007-10890-011) on the present author's original article (see record 2006-05420-002) regarding the evolution of psychoanalytic theory. I do not believe that misunderstanding or misrepresentation has played a part in these differences. What I think has been at play for almost 20 years has been a difference in outlook on scientific and social issues, and in our interpretations of the historical course of events affecting psychoanalytic theory. These are reversing in recent years, which I welcome. No objective events have taken place to account for these changes, only subjective developments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
Keywords:pluralism   theoretical fragmentation   unitary   total   composite theory   psychoanalytic theory   composite theory   general theory   clinical theory
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号