What makes good research in software engineering? |
| |
Authors: | Mary Shaw |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA; E-mail: mary.shaw@cs.cmu.edu, US |
| |
Abstract: | Physics, biology, and medicine have well-refined public explanations of their research processes. Even in simplified form,
these provide guidance about what counts as “good research” both inside and outside the field. Software engineering has not
yet explicitly identified and explained either our research processes or the ways we recognize excellent work. Science and
engineering research fields can be characterized in terms of the kinds of questions they find worth investigating, the research
methods they adopt, and the criteria by which they evaluate their results. I will present such a characterization for software
engineering, showing the diversity of research strategies and the way they shift as ideas mature. Understanding these strategies
should help software engineers design research plans and report the results clearly; it should also help explain the character
of software engineering research to computer science at large and to other scientists.
Published online: 13 June 2002 |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|