首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

MBR、MCR处理微污染水的膜污染比较
引用本文:郝爱玲,张光辉,张颖,顾平. MBR、MCR处理微污染水的膜污染比较[J]. 中国给水排水, 2004, 20(7): 49-53
作者姓名:郝爱玲  张光辉  张颖  顾平
作者单位:天津大学,环境科学与工程学院,天津,300072
基金项目:天津市科委重点科技攻关计划项目(013105211)
摘    要:膜污染是影响膜反应器稳定运行的重要原因之一,为此考察了膜生物反应器(MBR)和膜混凝反应器(MCR)处理微污染地表水时的运行状况,并对膜比通量的变化进行了比较,发现MBR的膜污染情况比MCR的严重。MCR和MBR的膜组件经物理、化学清洗后膜比通量分别恢复至新膜比通量的99.7%和76.9%,物理清洗对此的贡献较大。经分析发现,MCR中无机污染占优势,主要污染元素是Fe;MBR中微生物和有机物是膜污染的主要组成,而无机污染物则主要是铁盐和磷酸盐。

关 键 词:微污染原水 MBR MCR 膜比通量 膜污染
文章编号:1000-4602(2004)07-0049-05

Comparison of Membrane Fouling Between Membrane Bio-reactor (MBR) and Membrane Coagulation Reactor (MCR) for Micro-polluted Raw Water Treatment
HAO Ai-ling,ZHANG Guang-hui,ZHANG Ying,GU Ping. Comparison of Membrane Fouling Between Membrane Bio-reactor (MBR) and Membrane Coagulation Reactor (MCR) for Micro-polluted Raw Water Treatment[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2004, 20(7): 49-53
Authors:HAO Ai-ling  ZHANG Guang-hui  ZHANG Ying  GU Ping
Abstract:Operation of MBR and MCR for micro-polluted surface water treatment was investigated,and it was found by comparing the variation of membrane specific flux (SF) that membrane fouling of MBR is more serious than that of MCR.After physical and chemical cleaning of membrane,the membrane specific flux for MCR and MBR is recovered respectively to 99.7% and 76.9% of pure water specific flux,and physical cleaning makes more contribution to it.Analysis shows that element iron is the dominant foulant in MCR.While in MBR the composition of foulants comes mainly from microorganism and organic matters,and iron salts and phosphate are the main inorganic foulants.
Keywords:micro-polluted raw water  MBR  MCR  membrane specific flux  membrane flouling
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号