Social Disadvantage, Tenure and Location: An Analysis of Sydney and Melbourne |
| |
Authors: | Bill Randolph Darren Holloway |
| |
Affiliation: | a City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | This article focuses on the role that housing markets play in structuring patterns of social disadvantage in Australian cities, specifically Sydney and Melbourne. It explores the relationship between housing tenure and social disadvantage at the local scale (Census collector districts) for the two cities, following a discussion of the various stands of literature on housing tenure and socio-spatial polarisation in Australian cities. It analyses the relationship between areas of high social disadvantage and housing tenure. The analysis, which uses the ABS Index of Disadvantage, distinguishes locations where comparable levels of social disadvantage are associated with very different housing markets, one where public housing is prominent and others which are primarily areas of private sector housing. The social profiles of both types of area are described, drawing out differences between the two cities, as are changes in the extent of these areas over time. The policy implications for the areas of private sector housing are then discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Social disadvantage housing markets tenure spatial polarisation Sydney Melbourne |
本文献已被 InformaWorld 等数据库收录! |
|