首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于新的证据冲突衡量的加权证据融合方法
引用本文:毕文豪,张安,李冲.基于新的证据冲突衡量的加权证据融合方法[J].控制与决策,2016,31(1):73-78.
作者姓名:毕文豪  张安  李冲
作者单位:西北工业大学电子信息学院,西安710129.
基金项目:

航空基金项目(20138053038);国家自然科学基金项目(61573283).

摘    要:

对冲突证据使用Dempster-Shafer 证据理论进行融合的前提是对冲突证据作出正确衡量, 确定证据之间冲突的程度. 在分析现有的冲突衡量方法基础上, 提出一种基于新的证据冲突衡量的加权证据融合方法. 该方法通过相似性测度来衡量证据间的冲突程度; 然后确定各证据的可信度, 再加权修正证据; 最后用Dempster 组合规则进行融合. 算例表明, 该方法能正确衡量证据冲突程度, 有效地解决冲突证据的融合问题, 提高收敛速度和精度.



关 键 词:

D-S  证据理论|冲突衡量|相似性测度|可信度|证据融合

收稿时间:2014/8/29 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/12/22 0:00:00

Weighted evidence combination method based on new evidence conflict measurement approach
BI Wen-hao ZHANG An LI Chong.Weighted evidence combination method based on new evidence conflict measurement approach[J].Control and Decision,2016,31(1):73-78.
Authors:BI Wen-hao ZHANG An LI Chong
Abstract:

The correct measurement of conflict evidence and the conflict extent among evidences are the premise of using the Dempster-Shafer theory to complete the combination of conflict evidence. Some typical conflict measurement methods are reviewed by analyzing their advantages and disadvantages, and a new weighted evidence combination method is proposed base on the effective conflict measurement. Firstly, the conflict degree between two pieces of evidence is obtained from the similarity measure. Then the evidence credibility is given according to its amount of conflict with others. After that, the evidence is revised and weighted based on this credibility. Finally, the fusion is accomplished by adopting the combination rule of Dempster. Numerical examples illustrate that the proposed method can measure the degree of conflict evidence correctly, solve the problem of conflict evidence fusion effectively and improve the speed and accuracy of convergence.

Keywords:

D-S evidence theory|conflict measure|similarity measure|credibility|evidence combination

点击此处可从《控制与决策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《控制与决策》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号