Discrete return lidar-based prediction of leaf area index in two conifer forests |
| |
Authors: | Jennifer LR Jensen Karen S Humes Lee A Vierling Andrew T Hudak |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Environmental Science Program, Department of Geography, McClure Hall 227, P.O. Box 443021, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, United States;2. Department of Geography, McClure Hall 203, P.O. Box 443021, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, United States;3. Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management, Geospatial Laboratory for Environmental Dynamics, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1135, United States;4. Rocky Mountain Research Station, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 1221 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Leaf area index (LAI) is a key forest structural characteristic that serves as a primary control for exchanges of mass and energy within a vegetated ecosystem. Most previous attempts to estimate LAI from remotely sensed data have relied on empirical relationships between field-measured observations and various spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) derived from optical imagery or the inversion of canopy radiative transfer models. However, as biomass within an ecosystem increases, accurate LAI estimates are difficult to quantify. Here we use lidar data in conjunction with SPOT5-derived spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) to examine the extent to which integration of both lidar and spectral datasets can estimate specific LAI quantities over a broad range of conifer forest stands in the northern Rocky Mountains. Our results show that SPOT5-derived SVIs performed poorly across our study areas, explaining less than 50% of variation in observed LAI, while lidar-only models account for a significant amount of variation across the two study areas located in northern Idaho; the St. Joe Woodlands (R2 = 0.86; RMSE = 0.76) and the Nez Perce Reservation (R2 = 0.69; RMSE = 0.61). Further, we found that LAI models derived from lidar metrics were only incrementally improved with the inclusion of SPOT 5-derived SVIs; increases in R2 ranged from 0.02–0.04, though model RMSE values decreased for most models (0–11.76% decrease). Significant lidar-only models tended to utilize a common set of predictor variables such as canopy percentile heights and percentile height differences, percent canopy cover metrics, and covariates that described lidar height distributional parameters. All integrated lidar-SPOT 5 models included textural measures of the visible wavelengths (e.g. green and red reflectance). Due to the limited amount of LAI model improvement when adding SPOT 5 metrics to lidar data, we conclude that lidar data alone can provide superior estimates of LAI for our study areas. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|