首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies
Authors:John Geraghty  Cathal Heavey
Affiliation:(1) School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 Glasnevin, Ireland;(2) Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Abstract:In order to overcome the disadvantages of Kanban Control Strategy (KCS) in non-repetitive manufacturing environments, two research approaches have been followed in the literature in past two decades. The first approach has been concerned with developing new, or combining existing, pull-type production control strategies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control while increasing the ability of a production system to satisfy demand. The second approach has focused on how best to combine Just-In-Time (JIT) and Material-Requirements-Planning (MRP) philosophies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control in non-repetitive manufacturing environments. This paper provides a review of the research activities in these two approaches, presents a comparison between a Production Control Strategy (PCS) from each approach, and presents a comparison of the performance of several pull-type production control strategies in addressing the Service Level vs. WIP trade-off in an environment with low variability and a light-to-medium demand load. Correspondence to: John Geraghty
Keywords:Hybrid Push/Pull  CONWIP/Pull  EKCS  BSCS  Kanban  Markov decision process  Discrete event simulation  Simulated annealing optimization algorithm
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号