| 三门峡烟区主栽烤烟两品种烟叶质量比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王金林,刘国庆,张金召,周子方,黄五星,邵惠芳,许自成,刘超. 三门峡烟区主栽烤烟两品种烟叶质量比较[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 0(6): 14-17 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王金林 刘国庆 张金召 周子方 黄五星 邵惠芳 许自成 刘超 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]河南农业大学烟草学院,河南郑州450002 [2]江苏中烟工业有限责任公司,江苏南京210018 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司科技开发项目（JSZY201201）;河南省烟草公司科技攻关项目（HYKJ201103） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对三门峡市主栽烤烟品种（中烟100、秦烟96）烟叶的外观质量、化学成分和感官质量进行了评价和比较．结果表明，各主栽品种烟叶外观质量好，烟叶化学成分较协调，烟叶的香气特征以焦甜香为主，辅以焦香、辛香香韵，浓香型特征尚显著．结合江苏中烟三门峡渑池基地单元的烟叶质量目标要求，中烟100较秦烟96品种更能满足工业需求．
|
| 关 键 词： | 烟叶外观质量 烟叶化学成分 烟叶感官质量 |
Quality comparison of flue-cured tobacco leaves of main cultivars in Sanmenxia |
| |
| WANG Jin-lin,LIU Guo-qing,ZHANG Jin-zhao,ZHOU Zi-fang,HUANG Wu-xing,SHAO Hui-fang,XU Zi-cheng,LIU Chao. Quality comparison of flue-cured tobacco leaves of main cultivars in Sanmenxia[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry(Natural Science), 2013, 0(6): 14-17 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Jin-lin LIU Guo-qing ZHANG Jin-zhao ZHOU Zi-fang HUANG Wu-xing SHAO Hui-fang XU Zi-cheng LIU Chao |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. College of Tobacco Science ,He＇nan Agricultural University ,Zhengzhou 450002, China ; 2. China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co. ,Ltd. ,Nanjing 210018, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The appearance quality, chemical component and sensory quality of main cultivars （Zhongyan 100 and Qinyan 96） in Sanmenxia tobacco-growing area were evaluated and compared. The results showed that Sanrnenxia flue-cure tobacco leaves had good appearance quality, harmonious chemical components and significant full flavor style characteristic with prominent caramel sweetish aroma and supplemented by empyreumatique and spicy flavor. According to the tobacco quality target of Sanmenxia base unit of China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co. Ltd. ,Zhongyan 100 better meets the demands than Qinyan 96. |
| |
| Keywords: | tobacco leaf appearance quality tobacco leaf chemical component tobacco leaf sensory quality |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
