首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

区域坐标转换模型对比分析
引用本文:王萌,高远,范咪娜. 区域坐标转换模型对比分析[J]. 矿山测量, 2021, 49(2): 71-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-358X.2021.02.015
作者姓名:王萌  高远  范咪娜
作者单位:山东正元数字城市建设有限公司,山东 烟台 264670
摘    要:针对全国范围内开展的CGCS2000的建立工作,文中分析讨论了区域坐标转换中常用的平面四参数模型、仿射六参数模型和多项式逼近模型,以四川某区域施工坐标系与CGCS2000的转换工作为例,展开探讨.通过三种模型计算,发现平面四参数模型和仿射六参数模型容易受到系统误差影响,不适用于施工坐标系向CGCS2000的转化;而多项...

关 键 词:坐标转换  平面四参数模型  仿射六参数模型  多项式逼近模型

Comparative analysis of regional coordinate transformation models
Wang Meng,Gao Yuan,Fan Mina. Comparative analysis of regional coordinate transformation models[J]. Mine Surveying, 2021, 49(2): 71-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-358X.2021.02.015
Authors:Wang Meng  Gao Yuan  Fan Mina
Affiliation:(Shandong Zhengyuan Digital City Construction Co.,Ltd.,Yantai 264670,China)
Abstract:In view of the establishment of CGCS2000 in China,in the paper,the plane four parameter model,the affine six parameter model and the polynomial approximation model were analyzed and discussed,which were used commonly in regional coordinate transformation,and taking the transformation between the construction coordinate system and CGCS2000 in a regional in Sichuan as an example,the discussion was unfolded.Through the calculation of the three models,it was found that the plane four parameter model and the affine six parameter model were easily affected by the system errors,and were not suitable for the transformation from the construction coordinate system to the CGCS2000;while the polynomial approximation model had achieved the good conversion effect,and the maximum error of X coordinate was 0.08243 m,the minimum error was-0.2464 m,the maximum error of Y coordinate was 0.16171 m,the minimum error was -0.11217m,and the overall coordinate conversion accuracy was higher.
Keywords:coordinate transformation  plane four parameter model  affine six parameter model  polynomial approximation model
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号