首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

焊接缺陷磁光成像卷积神经网络识别方法
引用本文:季玉坤,高向东,刘倩雯,张艳喜,张南峰.焊接缺陷磁光成像卷积神经网络识别方法[J].仪器仪表学报,2021(2):107-113.
作者姓名:季玉坤  高向东  刘倩雯  张艳喜  张南峰
作者单位:1. 广东工业大学广东省焊接工程技术研究中心;2. 黄埔海关技术中心
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51675104)、广州市科技计划项目(202002020068,202002030147)资助
摘    要:对焊件表面及亚表面微小焊接缺陷进行检测是保证焊接质量的关键,提出一种基于深层卷积神经网络的磁光成像焊接缺陷检测方法。以法拉第磁致旋光效应为基础,分析磁光成像原理,建立深层卷积网络预测模型,研究不同模型结构参数对训练结果的影响。通过对深度卷积神经网络中间机理分析,研究模型训练过程并自动寻找卷积核最优参数。试验结果表明,第一层卷积核尺寸选择7×7和采用Relu激活函数可以使预测模型达到最佳效果,焊接缺陷磁光成像平均训练准确率为98.61%,凹坑、裂纹、未焊透、未熔合、无缺陷5种焊接试样预测准确率分别为84.38%、98.05%、84.38%、100%、100%,平均预测准确率为93.36%。

关 键 词:焊接缺陷  磁光成像  卷积神经网络  无损检测

Weld defect recognition method with magneto-optical imaging based on convolutional neural network
Ji Yukun,Gao Xiangdong,Liu Qianwen,Zhang Yanxi,Zhang Nanfeng.Weld defect recognition method with magneto-optical imaging based on convolutional neural network[J].Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument,2021(2):107-113.
Authors:Ji Yukun  Gao Xiangdong  Liu Qianwen  Zhang Yanxi  Zhang Nanfeng
Affiliation:1. Guangdong Provincial Welding Engineering Technology Research Center, Guangdong University of Technology; 2. Huangpu Customs Technology Center
Abstract:Detecting the surface and subsurface micro weld defects is the key to ensure welding quality. A weld defect detection method with magneto-optical imaging based on deep convolutional network is proposed. On the basis of Faraday magneto-optic rotation effect, the principle of magneto optical imaging is analyzed. A deep convolutional network prediction model is established to study the influence of different model structure parameters on the training results. Through analyzing the intermediate mechanism of deep convolutional neural network, the model training process is studied and the optimal parameters of convolution kernel are found automatically. Experiment results show that the optimal prediction model can be achieved by selecting the size of the first layer convolution kernel as (7×7) and using the Relu activation function. The average training accuracy of magneto-optical imaging of weld defects is 98. 61% , and the prediction accuracies of 5 weld samples with pit, crack, incomplete penetration, incomplete fusion and non-defect are 84. 38% , 98. 05% , 84. 38% , 100% and 100% , respectively, and the average prediction accuracy is 93. 36% .
Keywords:weld defect  magneto-optical imaging  convolutional neural network  nondestructive testing
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《仪器仪表学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《仪器仪表学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号