首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中外钢结构设计规范安全度水平的比较
引用本文:侯建国,吴春秋,龚治国. 中外钢结构设计规范安全度水平的比较[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2003, 36(5): 75-78
作者姓名:侯建国  吴春秋  龚治国
作者单位:武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:从综合安全系数的角度,对中国、美国和英国现行钢结构设计规范的安全度水平进行了计算、分析和比较.综合安全系数的计算结果表明,我国现行规范Ⅱ级结构的安全度水平普遍比美、英规范的安全度水平低;Ⅰ级结构的安全度水平则与美、英规范的安全度水平大体相当,且多数情况下略偏高一些.研究结果表明我国现行钢结构设计规范的安全度设置水平是基本合适的,规范修订时对Ⅱ级结构的安全度水平可作适当提高.

关 键 词:钢结构  设计规范  综合安全系数  安全度水平  比较
文章编号:1671-8844(2003)05-075-04
修稿时间:2001-04-23

Comparison between safety level of Chinese code of steel structure design and that of foreign codes
HOU Jian-guo,WU Chun-qiu,GONG Zhi-guo. Comparison between safety level of Chinese code of steel structure design and that of foreign codes[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2003, 36(5): 75-78
Authors:HOU Jian-guo  WU Chun-qiu  GONG Zhi-guo
Abstract:From the aspect of comprehensive safety factor, the calculation, analysis and comparison of the safty levels of Chinese, American, British codes of steel structures design are carried out. The results of calculation indicate that the safety level of Chinese active code of second-class structure design is lower than those of American and British codes at large. As far as first-class structure is concerned ,the level of Chinese code corresponds with American and British , and moreover , the levels of the laters are appreciably lower in many case. All these show that the safety level of Chinese active code of steel structures design is suitable on the whole, and moderate improvement for the safety level of second-class structures is feasible.
Keywords:steel structure  design code  comprehensive safety coefficient  safety level  comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号