中介语视角下对监察理论三项假说的分析

Krashen在20世纪70年代末和80年代初提出的监察理论为第二语言习得研究做出了积极的贡献。然而这一理论的一些基本概念缺乏科学性。语言学家Selinker提出的中介语是二语习得研究领域中一个相当重要的概念。本文从中介语理论的角度分析了监察理论的三项基本假说,认为:由于中介语的发展过程具有可预测性,因此自然顺序假说有一定的合理性,语言习得和学习假说忽略了语言学习过程中的认知过程,语言输入假说彻底地否认了产出性/主动性语言技能的作用。

An analysis of the three hypothese of Monitor Theory from the perspective of interlanguage

Monitor Theory, proposed by Krashen in the late 1970s and early 1980s, has contributed a lot to research on second language acquisition. However defaults can be found in Monitor Theory as some of its basic hypothese lack scientific bases. Interlanguage, advocated by linguist Selinker, has become a significant concept in research on second language acquisition. The present paper has analyzed three hypotheses of Monitor Theory from the perspective of interlanguage and drawn the conclusion that: Natural Order Hypothesis is reasonable, as the developmental process of interlanguage is predicable; Acquisition and Learning Hypothesis has ignored the cognitive process of language learning; Input Hypothesis had denied the function of positive learning skills.