| Abstract: | The confidence–accuracy (C–A) relation for general knowledge (GK) and eyewitness memory (EM) was compared in both within- and between-Ss analyses. Researchers in the cognitive tradition tend to use within-Ss designs and to find moderately positive C–A relations, whereas those in the forensic tradition tend to use between-Ss designs and to find no relations. 80 Ss took part in 1 of 2 conditions, EM or GK. No difference between conditions was found on the within-Ss measure of the C–A relation, but there was differentiation with a between-Ss measure. There was a strong positive C–A correlation (r?=?.58, p?r?=?–.11, ns). One source of this difference may be the differing opportunities for calibration offered by the 2 kinds of memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
