首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

火电厂循环与直流供水方案的经济性分析
引用本文:程道仓,徐得潜,朱志强.火电厂循环与直流供水方案的经济性分析[J].中国电力,2005,38(9):37-41.
作者姓名:程道仓  徐得潜  朱志强
作者单位:1. 合肥工业大学,土木与建筑学院,安徽,合肥,230009
2. 安徽省电力设计院,安徽,合肥,230022
摘    要:选择水源充足并采用直流供水是传统比选厂址优劣的一个重要因素。但是在水利部门征收水资源费的情况下.采用哪种供水方案更为经济合理,直流还是循环供水方案?以某临江火电厂工程为例,运用年费用最小法.把建设和运行费用统一折算到运行年,从而得出给定费率条件下不同供水系统的年费用值,并求出影响供水方案的水资源费率的临界值。同时从环保角度分析了温排水对直流供水方案的不利影响。其结论可为同类型电厂的建设和运行提供参考。

关 键 词:直流供水  循环供水  水资源费  年费用最小法  温排水
文章编号:1004-9649(2005)09-0037-05
收稿时间:2005-05-16
修稿时间:2005-06-08

Economical analysis of a circulating and once-through water supply system for power plant
CHENG Dao-cang,XU De-qian,ZHU Zhi-qiang.Economical analysis of a circulating and once-through water supply system for power plant[J].Electric Power,2005,38(9):37-41.
Authors:CHENG Dao-cang  XU De-qian  ZHU Zhi-qiang
Abstract:Traditionally, it is elementary for site selection to determine the places with abundant water and to use once-through cooling water system. Taking the water resource fee imposed by the water resource department into consideration, it is difficult to tell which is more economical between once-through cooling system and circulating cooling system. Certain power plant near river being an example in this paper, the annual expenses of the both under given rates were obtained through converting the construction investment and operation cost to the run-year with minimum-annual-expense method. In addition, the critical point of water resource fee rate was determined, which affects the scheme selection of cooling systems. From the point of environment protection, the harmful impacts of warm-wastewater draining on once-through cooling system was discussed as a reference for the construction and operation of power plants alike.
Keywords:once-through cooling system  circulating cooling system  water resource fee  minimum-annual-expense method  warmwastewater
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号