首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

洁净都市主义 vs 非洁净设计:把水基础设施系统作为城市水景观
引用本文:Antje Stokman.洁净都市主义 vs 非洁净设计:把水基础设施系统作为城市水景观[J].南方建筑,2015,0(4):72.
作者姓名:Antje  Stokman
摘    要:按照“洁净都市主义”的方式,建筑师、城市设计师、景观设计师通常假定那些关于水供给和处理的工程挑战需要通过一种技术性且最好看不见的方法来解决。这就让土地利用从流域的逻辑中分离了,并且导致了越来越多的洪水,干旱以及水污染。“非洁净设计”从另外一方面来说是指建筑师、城市设计师、景观设计师需要积极地参与现代水基础设施系统的设计中,并将其作为塑造城市形态以及迎合更广阔的人类、生态和美学目标的基础。这篇文章通过讲述两个分别来自于中国和欧洲的项目,来讨论如何将自然过程效能与空间设计策略相结合,整合工程、生态和城市设计思想。


Clean Urbanism vs. Dirty Design: Appropriating Water Infrastructure Systems as Urban Water Landscapes
Antje Stokman.Clean Urbanism vs. Dirty Design: Appropriating Water Infrastructure Systems as Urban Water Landscapes[J].South Architecture,2015,0(4):72.
Authors:Antje Stokman
Abstract:Following the approach of “Clean Urbanism”, architects, urban designers landscape architects usually assume that the engineering challenges related to the provision and disposal of water need to be solved in a technical and preferably invisible way. This has disconnected the land-use from the logics of the watershed and has led to increasing floods, droughts and water pollution. “Dirty Design” on the other hand means that architects, urban designers landscape architects need to get actively involved in the design of modern water infrastructure systems as a basis for shaping urban form and meeting broader human, ecological and aesthetic objectives. By presenting two projects from China and Europe, this paper discusses how to integrate the performance of natural processes and spatial design strategies, linking engineering, ecological and urban design thinking.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南方建筑》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南方建筑》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号