首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

液压系统弹簧刚度动态变化下的压力冲击余弦级数研究
引用本文:韩贺永,王凯,王晶,柳渊.液压系统弹簧刚度动态变化下的压力冲击余弦级数研究[J].液压与气动,2018,0(8):1-6.
作者姓名:韩贺永  王凯  王晶  柳渊
作者单位:太原科技大学重型机械教育部工程研究中心, 山西太原030024
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金(51505315)
摘    要:分析了油液含气量和液压缸活塞位移对液压油的有效体积弹性模量和液压缸等效动态弹簧刚度的影响,利用余弦级数计算出压力冲击的作用时间,并利用AMESim仿真软件验证所求时间的准确性。在此基础上利用动量定理推导出了压力冲击的计算公式,并求出了压力冲击的数值大小。研究结果表明,液压缸的等效动态弹簧刚度和油液中的含气量是影响压力冲击数值大小的主因,因此在设计液压系统时,可以降低油液中的含气量,提高液压缸的等效动态弹簧刚度来确保系统的稳定。以国内某钢厂的全液压双边滚切剪作为实验对象,由于数据采集的时间间隔为0.5 s/次,在出现压力冲击的时候数值没采集到,但是通过现场油管爆裂来看是有冲击产生的。通过分析理论推导与所采集到的压力冲击的大小,得出误差在11.12%左右,验证了理论推导的正确性。

关 键 词:压力冲击  动态弹簧刚度  含气量  有效体积弹性模量  
收稿时间:2018-04-03

Pressure Shock Cosine Series Under Dynamic Change of Spring Stiffness for Hydraulic System
HAN He-yong,WANG Kai,WANG Jing,LIU Yuan.Pressure Shock Cosine Series Under Dynamic Change of Spring Stiffness for Hydraulic System[J].Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics,2018,0(8):1-6.
Authors:HAN He-yong  WANG Kai  WANG Jing  LIU Yuan
Affiliation:Heavy Machinery Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi030024
Abstract:The influence of air content in oil and piston displacement of hydraulic cylinder on effective bulk elasticity modulus of hydraulic oil and equivalent dynamic spring stiffness of hydraulic cylinder is analyzed. The cosine series is used to calculate pressure shock time, and the software AMESim is used to verify accuracy of the time required. Based on this, a pressure shock formula is deduced and a numerical value of pressure shock is calculated by the momentum theorem. The results show that equivalent dynamic spring stiffness of hydraulic cylinder and air content in the fluid are the main factors that affect the magnitude of pressure shock. Therefore, when a hydraulic system is designed, we can reduce the air content in the fluid and improve the equivalent hydraulic cylinder dynamic spring stiffness to ensure system stability. Taking a full-hydraulic bilateral hobbing cutter made by a steel mill in China as the experimental object, we have no time to collect the numerical value when pressure shock occurs due to the large time interval of data collection, but an impact in view of burst on site is produced. Comparing theoretical derivation with magnitude of the pressure shock collected, we obtain that the error is about 11.12%, which verifies the correctness of theoretical derivation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《液压与气动》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《液压与气动》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号