首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

风险指引的CPR1000核电厂LBLOCA分析方法初步研究
引用本文:宋建阳,杨江,刘井泉,刘萍萍,王婷,吕逸君.风险指引的CPR1000核电厂LBLOCA分析方法初步研究[J].原子能科学技术,2018,52(6):1028-1033.
作者姓名:宋建阳  杨江  刘井泉  刘萍萍  王婷  吕逸君
作者单位:1.中广核研究院有限公司,广东 深圳518026;2.清华大学 工程物理系,北京100084
摘    要:随着核电厂安全分析方法的不断发展,结合传统确定论分析与概率风险评价(PSA)的风险指引型安全分析方法逐渐引起安审当局和核电业主的广泛关注。本文基于国际上风险指引型分析方法在其他领域的应用现状,提出了风险指引的大破口失水事故(LBLOCA)分析方法,并重新评估了CPR1000核电厂的堆芯燃料包壳峰值温度(PCT)裕量。在PSA分析中,识别并量化了LBLOCA发生后可能发生的162个事件序列,并采用确定论现实分析方法(DRM)对筛选出的18个概率较大的事件序列进行了计算分析。然后通过期望值评估法和特定序列覆盖法对LBLOCA的PCT裕量进行了评估。结果表明,本文方法下LBLOCA的PCT裕量约为36~55 ℃,相比于传统的DRM裕量提升了16~35 ℃。

关 键 词:风险指引    大破口失水事故    包壳峰值温度裕量

Preliminary Study on Risk-informed LBLOCA of CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plant
SONG Jianyang,YANG Jiang,LIU Jingquan,LIU Pingping,WANG Ting,LYU Yijun.Preliminary Study on Risk-informed LBLOCA of CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plant[J].Atomic Energy Science and Technology,2018,52(6):1028-1033.
Authors:SONG Jianyang  YANG Jiang  LIU Jingquan  LIU Pingping  WANG Ting  LYU Yijun
Affiliation:1.China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute, Shenzhen 518026, China; 2.Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:With the development of the safety assessment approach of nuclear power plants (NPPs), a risk-informed analysis methodology combining traditional deterministic methodology and probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) has aroused a widespread concern in nuclear safety authorities and nuclear power plant owners. Following the international application of risk-informed analysis methodology, the framework of risk-informed large break loss of coolant accident (LBLOCA) was proposed, and the peak cladding temperature (PCT) margin of CPR1000 nuclear power plant was re-evaluated in this paper. In the PSA analysis, 162 probabilistic sequences were identified and quantified after LBLOCA occured. Then 18 probabilistically significant sequences were selected for the deterministic methodology analysis with deterministic realistic method (DRM). Then the risk-informed PCT margin was evaluated by two different methods, namely the expecting value estimation method and the sequence probability coverage method. The results show that the PCT margin evaluated by the risk-informed LBLOCA is about 36-55 ℃, which is greater than that of the DRM by 16-35 ℃.
Keywords:risk-informed  large break loss of coolant accident  peak cladding temperature margin
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《原子能科学技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《原子能科学技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号