| Abstract: | Research on social compensation has documented that individuals may actually work harder collectively than individually under some conditions in order to compensate for the expected poor performance of other group members. The present study examined the joint effects of both coworker ability and coworker effort expectations on collective task performance. Participants (N?=?112) worked either coactively or collectively on an idea-generation task with a coworker who was believed to be either high or low on both effort and ability at the task. When group members were paired with a partner who they believed would exert low effort, they (a) compensated when the partner had low ability and (b) loafed when the partner had high ability. Implications of these findings for group research and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
