| 英汉语篇词汇衔接手段对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄莹,曹盛.英汉语篇词汇衔接手段对比研究[J].宁波工程学院学报,2009,21(4):11-15. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄莹 曹盛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 宁波工程学院,浙江,宁波,315211
2. 宁波市人民政府外事办公室,浙江,宁波,315010 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Halliday词汇衔接手段的理论和框架同时适用于英汉语篇的词汇衔接研究。重复、同义衔接和组合搭配是英汉语篇中常见的词汇衔接手段。在这三种衔接手段中,＂重复＂在英汉语篇中都是使用频率最高的,但是相比较来说,汉语中＂重复＂的使用频率大大高于英语。产生这一差异的原因包括：①英语词汇中同义词比汉语多;②英语重＂形合＂,汉语重＂意合＂;③汉语的语音文字特点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 衔接手段 重复 同义衔接 组合搭配 |
Lexical Cohesion in English and Chinese |
| |
| HUANG Ying,CHAO Sheng.Lexical Cohesion in English and Chinese[J].Journal of Ningbo University of Technology,2009,21(4):11-15. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Ying CHAO Sheng |
| |
| Affiliation: | HUANG Ying ,CHAO Sheng(1. Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315211, China; 2. Ningbo Foreign Affairs, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper makes an attempt to compare lexical cohesion in English and Chinese using Halliday ＆ Hasan＇s theoretical framework and groups lexical cohesion into three categories： repetition, synonymy, and collocation. Chinese tends to use more repetitions than English although repetition enjoys a higher frequency in both languages. This difference may be caused by three factors： ①English is rich in synonyms; ②Chinese is a paratactic language, while English is a hypotactic language; ③phonetic features in Chinese. |
| |
| Keywords: | cohesion repetition synonymy collocation |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
