| Abstract: | In order to evaluate the effect of swirl direction and intensity of primary/secondary stream on pulverized coal gasification performance, a numerical study was conducted. Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches are used for the gas and solid phase, respectively. The computation code was formulated with PSI‐cell method, k–? model for turbulence flow, Monte‐Carlo method for radiative heat transfer, and eddy dissipation model for gas‐phase reaction rate. A one‐step two‐reaction model is employed for the devolatilization of Kideco coal. Flow and reactor performance are varied by primary/secondary swirl intensity and direction. For weak primary swirl, the WSF region is minimized at the secondary vane angle beginning generation of internal recirculation zone and having peak coal burnout. The flame stability is improved at counterswirl rather than coswirl due to its intense shear. Meanwhile, for strong primary swirl, flow distribution and coal burnout are the reverse trend with those of weak swirl and the flame stability is somewhat enhanced at coswirl rather than counterswirl. To improve coal burnout and flame stability, it is confirmed that the swirl condition be proposed for moving the flame front position toward upstream. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
