| 基于AHP法的专家打分主战袒克性能综合评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 常列珍 马新谋. 基于AHP法的专家打分主战袒克性能综合评价[J]. 机械管理开发, 2007, 0(2): 4-6 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 常列珍 马新谋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中北大学,山西太原030051 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过采用AHP方法对主战坦克的性能进行了层次化，将主战坦克的性能归纳为攻击能力、机动能力、自卫能力和通信侦查能力，并以此作为准则。通过构造判断矩阵、计算出各自对整体的权重。进一步细化。计算出各具体指标对于准则的权重。通过专家打分，用前面计算的各指标的权重合成主战坦克的综合得分，进而可进行主战坦克综合性能评价和排队。结果证明，该方法可以有效的解决这类多目标、多准则排队和决策问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 层次分析方法 主战坦克 多准则 排队 评价 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-773X（2007）02-0004-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-08-31 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-01-15 |
Based on AHP Methodology and Expert Mark Main Battle Tank Performance Synthesis Evaluation |
| |
| Chang Liezhen Ma Xinmou. Based on AHP Methodology and Expert Mark Main Battle Tank Performance Synthesis Evaluation[J]. Mechanical Management and Development, 2007, 0(2): 4-6 |
| |
| Authors: | Chang Liezhen Ma Xinmou |
| |
| Affiliation: | North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper the performance of main battle tank is evaluated by using AHP methodology based on expert marking.Firstly the performance of main battle lank is described hierarchical structure.It is regarded attack capability, mobility capability,self-defence capability communication and control capability as criteria.Secondly the weight of each criteria is calculated through constructed judgement matrixes. Similarly the weight of each item of each criteria is calculated.Finally,the synthesis sorce is calculated through each item mark and its weight.The performance order of main battle tank was given. The result indicate that this methodology is efficient to solve multiple criteria order and decision making problem. |
| |
| Keywords: | AHP methodology Main battle tank Multiple criteria Order Evaluation |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
