| 埃克森IIR内胎与NR内胎的实际使用对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 贺海留,吕秉堂,曹振纲,梁启明,印建华,汪欣欣.埃克森IIR内胎与NR内胎的实际使用对比[J].轮胎工业,2000,20(5):278-282. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 贺海留 吕秉堂 曹振纲 梁启明 印建华 汪欣欣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京橡胶工业研究设计院!北京100039(贺海留，吕秉堂，曹振纲)，埃克森化工(梁启明，印建华，汪欣欣) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在试验条件相同的情况下，将ＩＩＲ内胎和ＮＲ内胎以单装和混装的方式进行实际使用对比试验。试验结果表明，ＩＩＲ内胎的气压损失率是ＮＲ内受的５０％左右；单装ＩＩＲ内轮胎的车辆比单装ＮＲ内胎轮胎的车辆平均节渍９．１１％，比ＩＩＲ内肥轮胎和ＮＲ内受轮胎混装的车辆平均节油５．７６％；装ＩＩＲ内胎轮胎的磨耗寿命比装ＮＲ内胎轮胎高７．５％；单装ＩＩＲ内胎轮胎的车辆滑行距离比单装ＮＲ内胎轮胎的车辆长；以ＩＩＲ内胎替
|
| 关 键 词： | IIR NR 内胎 气压损失率 节油性能 磨耗性能 轮 |
Comparative road test between Exxon IIR inner tube and NR inner tube |
| |
| HE Hailiu,L Bingtang,CAO Zhengang,LIANG Qiming,YIN Jianhua,WANG Xinxin.Comparative road test between Exxon IIR inner tube and NR inner tube[J].Tire Industry,2000,20(5):278-282. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Hailiu L Bingtang CAO Zhengang LIANG Qiming YIN Jianhua WANG Xinxin |
| |
| Affiliation: | HE Hailiu1,L Bingtang1,CAO Zhengang1,LIANG Qiming2,YIN Jianhua2,WANG Xinxin2 |
| |
| Abstract: | A comparative road test between Exxon IIR inner tube and NR inner tube equiped on vehicle in single or mixed way was carried out under the same test conditions. The test results showed that the inflation pressure retention of IIR inner tube was twice as large as that of NR tube;the vehicle equiped with IIR inner tubes consumed averagely 911% less fuel than that with NR inner tubes,and 576% less than that with mixed IIR inner tubes/NR inner tubes;the average tread life of tires equiped with IIR inner tubes was 75% higher than that with NR inner tubes;the coasting distance of the vehicle equiped with IIR inner tubes was longer than that with NR inner tubes;and the remarkable economic efficiency could be obtained by using IIR inner tube instead of NR one. |
| |
| Keywords: | IIR NR inner tube inflation pressure retention fuel saving tread wear life |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《轮胎工业》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《轮胎工业》下载全文 |
