首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessing LES models based on tabulated chemistry for the simulation of Diesel spray combustion
Affiliation:1. IFP Energies Nouvelles, 1 & 4 Avenue de Bois-Préau, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France;2. EM2C, CNRS and Ecole Centrale Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, 92295 Châtenay-Malabry, France;1. Sandia National Laboratories, MS 9053, PO Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551-0969, USA;2. University of Michigan, 1231 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;1. Mechanical Engineering – Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Tech University, Houghton, MI, USA;2. US ARL, VTD, Propulsion Division (RDRL-VTP), USA;3. Istituto Motori – CNR, Naples, Italy;1. ETH Zurich, Switzerland;2. Vir2sense, Switzerland;1. School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;2. School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;3. Ansys Inc., Lebanon, NH, USA;4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3139, USA
Abstract:In the context of large-eddy simulation (LES) of Diesel engine combustion, two LES combustion models are proposed. Their ability to predict autoignition delays and heat release of an autoigniting liquid α-methylnaphthalene/n-decane jet injected into a constant-volume chamber under Diesel-like conditions is assessed. These models retain the tabulation of a complex chemistry scheme using autoigniting homogeneous reactors (HR) at constant pressure. This allows accounting for the chemical complexity of heavy hydrocarbon fuels over the wide range of conditions representative for Diesel engines, at comparatively low CPU time overhead. The tabulated homogeneous reactor (THR) approach assumes the local structure of the reaction zone to be that of an HR, while the approximated diffusion flame (ADF) approach is based on autoigniting strained diffusion flames. Two variants of each approach are considered, either neglecting sub-grid-scale mixture fraction variance (THR and ADF models), or accounting for it via a presumed β-PDF (THR-pdf and ADF–PCM models). LES results indicate that the ADF model assuming diffusion flame structures tends to predict faster propagation of the combustion toward less reactive mixture fractions then the THR model. Moreover, neglecting the mixture fraction fluctuations strongly overestimates initial experimental heat release rates after autoignition. Comparison between models shows that this assumption yields higher reaction rates and temperature levels close to the stoichiometric mixture fraction zones. Predictions in terms of autoignition are remarkably close with all models, and exhibit very few variations from one realization to the other. Variations in global heat release rate become more apparent for different realizations at later instants, in relation to the interaction of large flow scales with combustion.
Keywords:Large-eddy simulation (LES)  Chemistry tabulation  Turbulent combustion  Autoignition  Nonpremixed combustion  Flamelet modeling  Diesel combustion
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号