Young children's false-belief reasoning: Interpretation of messages is no easier than the classic task.

E. J. Robinson and P. Mitchell (see record 1992-34569-001) devised a message-desire discrepant task in which a speaker gives a message based on a false belief. A correct nonliteral interpretation of the message requires taking into account this false belief, which children were more likely to achieve in this task than in a classic prediction task. In 2 studies reported here, the comparison using more closely matched tasks was repeated. Study 3 followed the Robinson and Mitchell procedure precisely but failed to replicate the constrast reported previously. Although the message-desire discrepant task reveals early understanding that messages are the product of mental representations, it offers no advantage over the classic test in revealing false-belief reasoning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)