Email small group peer review revisited |
| |
Authors: | Ellen Strenski [Author Vitae],Caley O&rsquo Dwyer Feagin [Author Vitae] [Author Vitae] |
| |
Affiliation: | a University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA b University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Attention to email exchanged among a small group of student peers supercedes discussion of networked computer labs and is distinguished from research on collaborative classroom work in general, on online peer tutoring in writing centers, on email communication in online professional writing courses, and on online discourse in general. Email peer response within small groups is different from larger-scale, one-to-many computer-based communication tools (CBCT) on class mailing lists, bulletin boards, blogs, and wikis on the one hand and smaller-scale, one-to-one email exchange between an individual student and a peer tutor on the other hand. The benefits of assignments that require small groups to respond electronically and asynchronously to each other's drafts are analyzed and illustrated: rhetorical/thematic, discursive/environmental, technological, logistical/time management. The practicalities of students’ exchange of drafts, deadlines, and other guidelines are explained and illustrated in typical student email responses and model instructor handouts. |
| |
Keywords: | CBCT Collaborative learning Computer-mediated classroom Email Group work Hybrid courses Online discourse Peer review |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|