首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A checklist for model credibility,salience, and legitimacy to improve information transfer in environmental policy assessments
Affiliation:1. Biometris, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. LEI Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 29703, 2502 LS, The Hague, The Netherlands;3. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands;4. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands;5. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Sciences, United Kingdom;2. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom;3. Collingwood Environmental Planning, 50 Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK;4. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, University Campus, Guildford, UK;5. Green Investment Group, Edinburgh, UK;1. Institute of Work Psychology, School of Management, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S7 1AF, UK;2. Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS1 9JT, UK;1. Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC), EUREF-Campus 19, 10829 Berlin, Germany;2. Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180, 10117 Berlin, Germany;3. Technical University Berlin, Economics of Climate Change, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany;4. UN Environment North America Office, 900 17th Street, Washington 20006, DC, USA;5. Environmental Policy Research Center, Free University Berlin, Ihnestraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany;1. Sciences Po Paris - CERI (Centre de recherches internationales), Université de Genève (UNIGE) - SPERI (Département de Science politique et relations internationales) and GSI (Global Studies Institute), Sciences II 30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet Case postale, CH - 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland;2. Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB) - REPI (Recherche et Enseignement en Politique Internationale), Université Laval (UL) - Département de Science Politique/CEPI (Chaire de recherche en Economie Politique Internationale), ULB - Institut d''études européennes, CP172/01 50, Av. Franklin Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
Abstract:Modelers involved in environmental policy assessments are commonly confronted with the lack of uptake of model output by policy actors. Actors have different expectations of models, condensed into three quality criteria: credibility, salience, and legitimacy. The fulfilment of quality criteria is also dynamic as expectations vary, change, and possibly counteract each other. We present a checklist for modelers involved in model-based assessments that is aimed at the identification and monitoring of issues, limitations and trade-offs regarding model quality criteria. It draws upon the literature of integrated assessments as well as case study analysis of environmental policy assessments for the Dutch government, based on expert interviews and embedded experience. The checklist is intended to be consulted during assessments; its application may result in greater awareness among modelers involved in assessments regarding model quality criteria, and may positively affect the uptake of model-based knowledge from environmental policy assessments by policy actors.
Keywords:Model quality  Stakeholder expectations  Environmental assessment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号