| 三种煤气化技术的比较及相互促进 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杜始南. 三种煤气化技术的比较及相互促进[J]. 中氮肥, 2005, 0(5): 4-7 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杜始南 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 原平化学工业集团有限责任公司,山西,原平,034100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对固定床、流化床、气流床三种气化炉在用煤、碳转化率、气化效率、热效率及对环境污染的综合比较,使大家对三种煤气化技术各自的长处和特点有了清晰了解。三种技术除了存在相互竞争外,也存在相互促进。
|
| 关 键 词： | 煤气化 固定床 流化床 气流床 相互促进 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9932(2005)05-0004-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-02-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-02-02 |
Comparison and facilitation of three kinds of gasification technology |
| |
| DU Shi-nan. Comparison and facilitation of three kinds of gasification technology[J]. M-Sized Nitrogenous Fertilizer Progress, 2005, 0(5): 4-7 |
| |
| Authors: | DU Shi-nan |
| |
| Abstract: | By comparing fixed bed gasifier, fluidized bed gasifier and entrained-flow gasifier from ratio of carbon conversion,efficiency of coal gasification, heat efficiency, to environment pollution, it could be clearly understand to the advantages and characteristics of these three technologies. They competed and facilitated each other. |
| |
| Keywords: | coal gasification fixed bed fluidized bed entrained-flow facilitated each other |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
