Some problems for bundle CHF prediction based on CHF measurements in simple flow geometries

A comparison of critical heat flux (CHF) fuel bundles data with CHF data obtained in simple flow geometries was made. The base for the comparison was primary experimental data obtained in annular, circular, rectangular, triangular, and dumb-bell shaped channels cooled with water and R-134a. The investigated range of flow parameters (pressure, mass flux, and critical quality) in R-134a was chosen to be equivalent to modern nuclear reactor water flow conditions (p=7 and 10 MPa, G=350–5000 kg (m² s)⁻¹, x_cr=−0.1–1). The proper scaling laws were applied to convert the data from water to R-134a equivalent conditions and vise versa. The effects of flow parameters (p, G, x_cr) and the effects of geometric parameters (D, L) were evaluated during comparison. The comparison showed that no one simple flow geometry can be used for accurate and reliable bundle CHF prediction in wide range of flow parameters based on local (critical) conditions approach. The comparison also showed that the limiting critical quality phenomenon is unique characteristic for each flow geometry which depends on many factors: flow conditions (pressure and mass flux), geometrical parameters (diameter or surface curvature, gap size, etc.), flow obstructions (spacers, appendages, turbulizers, etc.) and others.