| DB模式与EPC模式的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石林林,丰景春. DB模式与EPC模式的对比研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2014, 0(6): 81-85 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石林林 丰景春 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河海大学商学院项目管理研究所,江苏南京,211100 |
| |
| 基金项目： | “十一五”国家科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAB04A13)；江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金(07SJD630006)． |
| |
| 摘 要： | DB模式和EPC模式均属于设计与施工一体化的组织管理模式,但两者存在明显的差异。现有研究主要比较了合同内容方面的差异性,没有从管理体制这一根本层次上分析两者的差别。在着重分析两种模式管理体制的基础上,详细对比了合同内容上的区别,分别从承包范围、设计工作内容、风险分担、索赔范围、适用范围等方面,提出了DB模式和EPC模式之间的主要差异。对比分析结果对进一步研究DB、EPC模式的相关问题具有理论参考价值,同时对工程管理实践具有指导意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 工程总承包模式 DB模式 EPC模式 |
Comparative Study on DB Mode and EPC Mode |
| |
| SHI Lin-lin,FENG Jing-chun. Comparative Study on DB Mode and EPC Mode[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2014, 0(6): 81-85 |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Lin-lin FENG Jing-chun |
| |
| Affiliation: | ( School of Business, Institute of Project Management Informationization, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | DB and EPC are both management mode of design and construction organization integration,but there are obvious differences between the two. Former studies compare the differences in contract terms,but do not analyze the differences between the management system from the fundamental level. This paper analyzes the management system of the two modes. And on such basis,a detailed comparison of the differences in contract scope,design,risk sharing,claims scope,and application scope between DB and EPC is conducted. Comparative analysis results of this study are valuable for further research on DB and EPC,and are of guiding significance for project management practices. |
| |
| Keywords: | general contractor mode DB mode EPC mode |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
