首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Optimisation of the partial napping approach for the successful capturing of mouthfeel differentiation between brandy products
Affiliation:1. Institute for Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland (Stellenbosch), South Africa;2. Distell Ltd, PO Box 184, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa;3. Nofima Mat, Oslovegen 1, 1430 Ås, Norway;4. University of Copenhagen, Denmark;1. Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161, Rome, Italy;2. Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy;1. Centro Trasferimento Tecnologico, Fondazione E. Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all’Adige, TN, Italy;2. Universidad de la Republica Uruguay, Facultad de Quimica, Gral. Flores 2124, C.P. 11800, Montevideo, Uruguay;1. Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Facultat d’Enologia, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain;2. Estación Enológica de Galicia, Ponte San Clodio – Leiro, 32427 Leiro, Spain;3. ASIS, Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Bioprocesos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile
Abstract:Partial napping has been validated as a suitable sensory profiling method for brandy evaluation. However, it was found that, compared to conventional profiling, very little useful information could be extracted on brandy mouthfeel when it was evaluated as part of overall in-mouth perceptions. This study aimed to optimise the partial napping method to improve information output on the mouthfeel of brandies. Panellists’ proficiency in visual, aroma and in-mouth evaluation of brandies were scrutinised after which three partial napping protocols were tested to identify the most effective solution for the successful capturing of mouthfeel differences between brandies. The results showed that panellists were equally efficient in aroma and in-mouth evaluations, but that in-mouth perception (defined as retronasal flavour, basic taste and mouthfeel) was not a useful construct as it did not contribute to the product configuration that could be obtained with visual and colour assessments alone. Instructing panellists to ignore retronasal flavour delivered more useful results. Using dark glasses and nose-clips to eliminate visual, aroma and retronasal flavour perceptions were not necessary to obtain a reliable and interpretable representation of the mouthfeel differences between brandies. Clear glasses and written instructions were sufficient to generate useful mouthfeel information under conditions more representative of the consumer product experience.
Keywords:Projective mapping  Brandy  Sensory modalities  Partial napping  Panellist performance
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号