Contractor as Trust Initiator in Construction Partnering—Prisoner’s Dilemma Perspective |
| |
Authors: | Peter S. P. Wong Sai On Cheung Peter K. M. Ho |
| |
Affiliation: | 1Member, Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. 2Director, Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. 3Director, Davis Langdon & Seah (Hong Kong) Ltd., 2101 Leighton Centre, 77 Leighton Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong.
|
| |
Abstract: | Partnering has been advocated for use in construction as a project-delivery approach to curb dispute and enable a cooperative contracting environment. Successful construction partnering is perceived to derive benefits to both developers and contractors. In view of significant implications to successful project delivery, there has been a surge of research and studies on construction partnering. These studies typically focus on the partnering process as well as the identification of critical success factors. Among the various success factors that underpin partnering success, establishing trust among partners is considered the most important. Moreover, skeptics have been swift to point out that establishing trust in construction is daunting. A better understanding of the role of trust and its manifestation in partnering efforts is therefore of both academic and practical value. In this study, motivating trust in construction partnering is described within the classic framework of “the prisoner’s dilemma,” which suggests the trust cycle can be kick-started if construction partners put cooperation before competition and self-interest. This paper reports a study that is designed to suggest a suitable candidate for the trust initiator. As such, the critical trust factors for two groups of construction partners in Hong Kong—developers/consultants and contractors—are first identified. It is found that “performance” and “permeability” of partners are the two most critical trust factors. “Performance” describes the partner’s competence and problem-solving ability as perceived by their counterpart. “Permeability” reflects the partner’s openness in sharing information. The result of a multiple-regression analysis further suggests that the contractor is in a position to initiate trust through competent performance and maintaining effective communication with the client. In this manner, the trust cycle can expand with reciprocal trustworthiness from the client. |
| |
Keywords: | Partnerships Construction industry Contract management Contractors Hong Kong |
|
|